![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdaCi9-Bn4O329H_lChS7z-w2HKS13Q58NtvqkzQ5pKtg1o8BlqDWhOkfNmblvBdyfx6IPD93kPX4yf81cttUj7kRhl6cfnzGvEw0pc2K7YE0ono6fej0RShyphenhyphen8UHvXyEo8Tp5Gkx2Tj4Y/s200/thisweeksplot.jpg)
For some obscure reason blogger does not let me put on my text here fully, so see the first comment for that....
This is the blog for Leiden Observatory's 'Galaxies' Journal club. This is a space for journal clubbers to post interesting single plots that they find as they troll through 'The Literature', with some brief (non-)scathing commentary. Presumably, if you're not a member, you're already gone.
1 comment:
In 1009.3189 ('How does galaxy environment matter? The relationship between galaxy environments, colour and stellar mass at 0.4<z<1 in the Palomar/DEEP2 survey' by Grutzbach et al) the authors investigate the dependence of galaxy colours (mainly) as a function of stellar mass and several 'independent' measures of environment (halo mass, nearest neighbour densities and several dynamical quantities in a fixed 1Mpc aperture). They find that stellar mass is the main driver of galaxy colours. There is a correlation between environment and stellar mass that also explains the weak correlations between environment and colour. The plot(s) that I picked show(s) the strong dependence of colours on stellar mass and the weak dependence on halo mass in all three redshift bins probed.
Post a Comment